NFL

Houston texan player on heat over trading football for courtroom: Stefon Diggs sues Mulan Hernandez for alleged extortion

Houston Texans wide receiver Stefon Diggs has taken legal action against his ex-girlfriend, Mulan Hernandez, alleging extortion, assault, and destruction of property. The lawsuit, filed by Diggs, accuses Hernandez of engaging in a series of destructive and aggressive acts during an incident that took place on June 7, 2024. According to Diggs, Hernandez showed up uninvited at his residence, where she allegedly caused significant damage to his personal belongings and became physically violent with him.

 

The legal complaint details the extent of the damage Hernandez is accused of causing. Diggs claims that she destroyed his computer, threw his phone into the toilet, and broke an expensive watch valued at $130,000. In addition to the property damage, Diggs alleges that Hernandez physically attacked him by punching him multiple times in the chest. He also asserts that she verbally threatened him, specifically targeting his NFL career. These alleged actions have led Diggs to seek financial compensation, as well as legal protection from further incidents.

 

In response to the lawsuit, Hernandez has publicly refuted Diggs’ claims and has instead accused him of being the aggressor in the situation. She alleges that Diggs physically assaulted her during the same June 7 incident, causing her to sustain a concussion. To support her claims, Hernandez has shared medical records on social media, which reportedly show that she received treatment for a minor closed head injury and concussion on the same date.

 

The legal battle between Diggs and Hernandez has quickly become a contentious and public dispute. Diggs, who is requesting monetary relief between $250,000 and $1 million, has retained attorney Kent Schaffer to represent him. Schaffer has dismissed Hernandez’s allegations, characterizing them as an attempt to financially exploit Diggs. According to Schaffer, Hernandez was never in a serious relationship with Diggs but instead had a brief and casual involvement with him. The attorney suggests that her claims are a strategic move to gain financial benefit from their past connection.

 

While the case is still unfolding, both parties have made serious accusations against each other, creating a complex legal situation. Diggs’ lawsuit emphasizes the physical and financial damage he claims to have suffered due to Hernandez’s actions, while Hernandez’s counterclaims suggest that she, too, was a victim of violence. The contrasting narratives presented by both sides make it unclear what truly transpired during the alleged altercation, leaving the legal system to determine the facts of the case.

 

The lawsuit has also sparked public interest due to Diggs’ high-profile status as an NFL player. As a key wide receiver for the Houston Texans, Diggs is a well-known athlete with a significant public following. His legal troubles could have implications for his reputation and career, particularly if the case continues to receive widespread media attention. Meanwhile, Hernandez’s allegations against him add another layer of complexity, as she seeks to portray herself as the victim in the situation.

 

This legal dispute underscores the challenges that come with high-profile relationships and the potential for personal conflicts to escalate into public legal battles. Regardless of the outcome, the case highlights issues related to domestic disputes, allegations of assault, and the financial implications of such lawsuits. Both Diggs and Hernandez will likely face intense scrutiny as their legal teams work to prove their respective claims.

 

As the case progresses, more details may emerge that could shed light on what truly happened on June 7, 2024. For now, the legal system will play a crucial role in determining the validity of the accusations on both sides and whether either party will be held accountable for their alleged actions.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *