Two summers ago, the New Jersey Devils were poised to make waves in free agency once again. Despite a disappointing 2021-2022 season, they saw themselves on the verge of a turnaround, bolstered by promising young talents like Nico Hischier and Jack Hughes signed to team-friendly deals. With cap space freed up by the expiration of PK Subban’s hefty contract, the Devils were eager to add the right pieces to support their emerging core.
Their initial target was Johnny Gaudreau, the prized forward of that free agency class, but he chose Columbus instead. This prompted a pivot to Ondrej Palat, signing him to a five-year, $30 million deal ($6 million AAV). This move was met with mixed reactions: some saw it as a solid Plan B, while others viewed it as a costly panic move.
Reflecting on the signing, there’s a spectrum of opinions among Devils fans. Some label Palat’s contract a disaster, while others consider it tolerable despite its occasional overpayment. Critics point to his modest production – 54 points in 120 games over his first two seasons – and question whether the investment has paid off.
Palat’s supporters argue that his impact transcends statistics. Recognized for his leadership qualities, Palat wears an ‘A’ on his jersey and is regarded as a pivotal figure in guiding young players through the rigors of NHL competition. His influence in the locker room, they argue, justifies his contract even if his on-ice numbers don’t always dazzle.
The debate extends beyond performance metrics. It delves into whether Palat’s contract has hindered the Devils’ flexibility to make other moves. While some speculate about missed opportunities, others contend that the team’s financial maneuvers have been relatively unhindered by Palat’s deal.
Looking ahead, the trajectory of Palat’s contract hinges on several factors: his ability to stay healthy, his role within the team, and the broader financial landscape of the NHL. At 33, he faces the challenge of maintaining his productivity amid increasing competition for roster spots.
Critics argue that Palat’s contract may not age well, especially as he enters his mid-30s and faces the wear and tear from over a decade of NHL play. Supporters counter with optimism about his intangible contributions and the potential for his contract to become more palatable as the salary cap continues to rise.
Ultimately, the assessment of Palat’s contract rests on a nuanced understanding of his role within the Devils’ lineup and the broader context of NHL economics. While his statistics may not always justify his salary, his leadership and locker room presence offer intangible value that complicates any straightforward evaluation of his tenure in New Jersey.
