NHL Trade Talk: Canucks Turn Down Rangers’ Offer of Zibanejad for Miller
In a surprising development within the NHL trade landscape, Josh Yohe of The Athletic reported that the New York Rangers proposed a significant trade to the Vancouver Canucks, which the Canucks declined. According to the report, Rangers’ GM Chris Drury floated a one-for-one swap: Mika Zibanejad for J.T. Miller. This contradicts earlier speculation that no formal trade offers had been made, signaling Drury’s serious interest in reacquiring Miller, a former Ranger.
Yohe’s report sheds light on the proposal, stating:
“Earlier this season, the Rangers offered struggling center Mika Zibanejad to Vancouver in return for Miller. The Canucks turned down the offer. It’s no secret that the Rangers are very interested in Miller, who was drafted by New York in 2011 and played his first six NHL seasons there.”
The revelation has added a new layer to ongoing rumors about the Rangers’ desire to improve their lineup and the Canucks’ stance on Miller’s future.
—
Did the Rangers Discuss the Trade with Zibanejad?
A key aspect of this trade scenario involves the contractual no-movement clauses both Zibanejad and Miller have. These clauses require players to approve any trade before it can happen, adding an additional layer of complexity to negotiations.
There is no confirmation that the Rangers had approached Zibanejad about waiving his no-movement clause. It’s possible the Rangers intended to initiate that conversation only if Vancouver accepted their offer or presented a counterproposal. This aligns with prior reports suggesting Zibanejad might be willing to waive his clause for the right opportunity.
In December, Nick Alberga of Leafs Nation mentioned that the Toronto Maple Leafs could consider exploring a trade for Zibanejad. He wrote:
“It would be a complicated deal to put together, but at the very least, I think the Leafs should inquire on Mika Zibanejad’s availability.”
Alberga also cited sources claiming Zibanejad might waive his no-movement clause if the circumstances suited him. Whether the Canucks would have been an acceptable destination remains unknown. However, the lack of communication between Zibanejad and the Rangers regarding this specific trade offer leaves questions unanswered.
—
Why Did the Canucks Decline the Trade?
The Canucks’ rejection of the trade likely reflects their valuation of J.T. Miller. At the time, it appears Vancouver saw Miller as a more valuable asset than Zibanejad, whose performance has been inconsistent this season. Miller has been a key contributor to the Canucks’ offense and plays an important leadership role within the team.
However, circumstances can change rapidly in the NHL. While the Canucks may have initially prioritized retaining Miller, the relationship between him and fellow star Elias Pettersson has reportedly become strained in recent weeks. These tensions could influence the Canucks’ willingness to revisit trade discussions, especially if they believe moving Miller would resolve internal issues or improve team dynamics.
The situation raises the question: Would the Canucks be more open to a similar trade now than they were earlier this season? And, if so, would the Rangers be willing to re-engage with Vancouver on a deal involving Zibanejad and Miller?
—
Revisiting the Possibility of a Trade
Despite the Canucks’ initial rejection, it’s possible the Rangers could return with a revised offer. For the Rangers, J.T. Miller represents a familiar and versatile player who could strengthen their roster. Having been drafted by New York in 2011 and spending six seasons with the team, Miller has a proven track record with the Rangers. His ability to play both center and wing, combined with his offensive production, makes him an attractive target for the organization.
For Vancouver, Mika Zibanejad, despite his struggles this season, remains a skilled and experienced center. If tensions between Miller and Pettersson continue to escalate, the Canucks might reconsider their stance on trading Miller, particularly if they feel Zibanejad could provide comparable value on the ice.
Additionally, the Canucks could explore ways to enhance the trade offer, possibly by including other assets to balance the deal. Such adjustments could make the proposal more appealing to both sides.
—
Challenges in Moving Star Players
Trading high-profile players like Zibanejad and Miller is inherently complex, especially when no-movement clauses are involved. Beyond contractual considerations, teams must evaluate the potential impact on their rosters, team chemistry, and future plans.
For the Rangers, parting with Zibanejad would mean losing a player who has been a significant presence on their roster in recent years. Despite his struggles, Zibanejad has shown the ability to be a dynamic playmaker and scorer. However, acquiring Miller could provide the Rangers with a fresh start and an opportunity to bolster their lineup for a playoff push.
On the other hand, the Canucks must weigh the benefits of keeping Miller against the potential drawbacks of the ongoing tensions within their locker room. If the relationship between Miller and Pettersson becomes untenable, Vancouver may feel compelled to act, whether by revisiting this trade or exploring
